In the authors' words
“The second group showed a higher bone production than the third group.”
What was measured
- Bone density Mixed results
About the study
- Type
- Randomised trial
- Who took part
- Perimenopausal, low bone density
- How many
- 82
- How long
- 30 weeks
- Exercise
- Exercise with supplements, General physical activity
- Cited
- 2 times, per Europe PMC
- PubMed ID
- 16259286
How to read this. Each line is one study, summarised in plain language from its PubMed abstract, with the authors' own sentence underneath on the study page. A count of studies is not a verdict: trials differ in size, length and quality, and a result in one group of women may not hold in another. Nothing here is medical advice.
Summaries are generated, then checked by machine against the abstract they came from; any summary that could not be matched word for word was left out. Our clinical lead is reviewing the summaries topic by topic, and this note will change when that is done. Corpus last refreshed 2026-11-03. Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will fix the summary or remove the study.
Similar studies
- A meta-analysis of 19 trials in postmenopausal women found adding exercise to medicine or supplements improved lumbar spine bone density, leg muscle strength, balance, and quality of life.
- A meta-analysis of five trials in older or postmenopausal adults found creatine supplementation added to resistance training did not improve bone mineral density more than resistance training alone.
- A meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials in menopausal women found exercise improved body fat, waist circumference, triglycerides, and lumbar spine bone density compared with no exercise.
- A meta-analysis combining studies with quality scores estimated an overall positive effect of physical activity on preventing spinal bone density loss in healthy postmenopausal women.