In the authors' words
“No significant difference in BMD was observed for the exercise vs home-based group.”
What was measured
- Bone density No difference found
About the study
- Type
- Randomised trial
- Who took part
- Early postmenopausal, breast cancer survivors
- How many
- 154
- How long
- 52 weeks
- Exercise
- Aerobic plus resistance, Exercise with supplements
- Cited
- 27 times, per Europe PMC
- PubMed ID
- 26850265
How to read this. Each line is one study, summarised in plain language from its PubMed abstract, with the authors' own sentence underneath on the study page. A count of studies is not a verdict: trials differ in size, length and quality, and a result in one group of women may not hold in another. Nothing here is medical advice.
Summaries are generated, then checked by machine against the abstract they came from; any summary that could not be matched word for word was left out. Our clinical lead is reviewing the summaries topic by topic, and this note will change when that is done. Corpus last refreshed 2026-11-03. Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will fix the summary or remove the study.
Similar studies
- A review of 43 trials in postmenopausal women found exercise, especially resistance training and combined programmes, produced a small but statistically significant increase in bone density versus no exercise.
- A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials found combined exercise programs significantly increased bone density at the spine, hip, and total body in postmenopausal women.
- A meta-analysis of 16 trials in older postmenopausal women found whole-body vibration raised lumbar spine bone density while aerobic exercise lowered it, with no overall effect on femoral neck density.
- A network meta-analysis of 49 trials in postmenopausal women found combined aerobic plus resistance training produced the largest bone density gains, followed by aerobic exercise and resistance training alone.