In the authors' words
“When compared with the CG (between-group differences), our analysis revealed significant benefits in the PG for all measures except for global cognitive function and functional flexibility (Back Scratch Test).”
What was measured
- Memory and thinking No difference found
- Muscle strength Reported an improvement
- Balance and falls Reported an improvement
About the study
- Type
- Randomised trial
- Who took part
- Postmenopausal
- How many
- 110
- How long
- 12 weeks
- Exercise
- Pilates
- Cited
- 32 times, per Europe PMC
- PubMed ID
- 32443744
How to read this. Each line is one study, summarised in plain language from its PubMed abstract, with the authors' own sentence underneath on the study page. A count of studies is not a verdict: trials differ in size, length and quality, and a result in one group of women may not hold in another. Nothing here is medical advice.
Summaries are generated, then checked by machine against the abstract they came from; any summary that could not be matched word for word was left out. Our clinical lead is reviewing the summaries topic by topic, and this note will change when that is done. Corpus last refreshed 2026-11-03. Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will fix the summary or remove the study.
Similar studies
- A review of 5 studies totalling 143 participants, mostly postmenopausal women with fracture risk, found low-certainty evidence that Pilates improved physical function and quality of life.
- In a 12-week trial, 110 women over 60 doing Pilates showed better balance confidence, less fear of falling, and improved postural control than a no-exercise control group.
- In postmenopausal women aged 50 to 60, Zumba training improved postural control under conflicting sensory conditions more than Pilates training.
- Postmenopausal women with chronic low back pain did Pilates with or without elastic resistance for 8 weeks and both groups reported less pain and more lumbar strength afterward.