In the authors' words
“After 6 weeks, a significant decrease in anthropometric variables was observed for all groups (P < 0.01).”
What was measured
- Fitness Reported an improvement
- Body fat and weight Reported an improvement
About the study
- Type
- Controlled trial
- Who took part
- Midlife women, overweight or obesity
- How many
- 56
- How long
- 6 weeks
- Exercise
- High-intensity intervals
- Cited
- 3 times, per Europe PMC
- PubMed ID
- 32898025
How to read this. Each line is one study, summarised in plain language from its PubMed abstract, with the authors' own sentence underneath on the study page. A count of studies is not a verdict: trials differ in size, length and quality, and a result in one group of women may not hold in another. Nothing here is medical advice.
Summaries are generated, then checked by machine against the abstract they came from; any summary that could not be matched word for word was left out. Our clinical lead is reviewing the summaries topic by topic, and this note will change when that is done. Corpus last refreshed 2026-11-03. Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will fix the summary or remove the study.
Similar studies
- A meta-analysis of 38 studies found high-intensity interval training reduced weight and fat mass in women, but effects on weight and fat mass were only significant before menopause, not after.
- A review found that 12 to 16 weeks of recreational football training in women aged 18 to 65 improved aerobic fitness, blood pressure, fat loss, lipid profile and bone mineralisation.
- In postmenopausal breast cancer survivors, 6 weeks of interval or continuous aerobic training both improved cardiorespiratory fitness by about 12%, with interval training also improving strength and weight more.
- In overweight postmenopausal women, 12 weeks of HIIT or HIIT plus resistance training reduced abdominal and visceral fat more than moderate-intensity continuous training.