In the authors' words
“The IVhet model determined SMDs of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.16-0.42), 0.27 (95% CI: 0.16-0.39), and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30-0.52) for LS, FN, and THBMD, respectively.”
What was measured
- Bone density Reported an improvement
About the study
- Type
- Meta-analysis
- Who took part
- Postmenopausal
- How many
- 5,581
- Exercise
- Other exercise
- Cited
- 56 times, per Europe PMC
- PubMed ID
- 36749350
How to read this. Each line is one study, summarised in plain language from its PubMed abstract, with the authors' own sentence underneath on the study page. A count of studies is not a verdict: trials differ in size, length and quality, and a result in one group of women may not hold in another. Nothing here is medical advice.
Summaries are generated, then checked by machine against the abstract they came from; any summary that could not be matched word for word was left out. Our clinical lead is reviewing the summaries topic by topic, and this note will change when that is done. Corpus last refreshed 2026-11-03. Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will fix the summary or remove the study.
Similar studies
- A meta-analysis of 13 trials with 699 postmenopausal women found exercise produced a small but statistically significant increase in lumbar spine bone density compared with controls.
- A meta-analysis of 7 RCTs in breast cancer patients found exercise for at least a year did not preserve bone density in postmenopausal women but reduced femoral neck bone loss in premenopausal women.
- A meta-analysis of 10 controlled trials in postmenopausal women found exercise did not significantly improve femoral neck bone mineral density compared with control.
- A meta-analysis of randomized trials in postmenopausal women found that lower-body exercise produced small but significant improvements in tibial bone density compared to no exercise.