In the authors' words

“Participants (mean age 61.5 +/- 3.6 years) receiving WomenWellness showed significantly greater reductions in IC composite scores than controls (beta = 0.39, 95 % CI = 0.03-0.75, p = .032), with domain-specific benefits including reduced chair stand times (beta = 1.57, 95 % CI = 0.51-2.63, p = .004), ASMI preservation (beta = -0.32, 95 % CI = -0.60--0.04, p = .027), cardiorespiratory fitness gains (beta = -11.47, 95 % CI = -16.89--6.04, p < .001), lower malnutrition risk (OR = 0.26, 95 % CI = 0.08-0.84, p = .025), and reduced visual impairment (OR = 0.28, 95 % CI = 0.12-0.65, p = .003).”

What was measured

About the study

Type
Randomised trial
Who took part
Postmenopausal, other condition
How many
176
How long
12 weeks
Exercise
Aerobic plus resistance, Balance and functional training
Cited
2 times, per Europe PMC
PubMed ID
41276193

How to read this. Each line is one study, summarised in plain language from its PubMed abstract, with the authors' own sentence underneath on the study page. A count of studies is not a verdict: trials differ in size, length and quality, and a result in one group of women may not hold in another. Nothing here is medical advice.

Summaries are generated, then checked by machine against the abstract they came from; any summary that could not be matched word for word was left out. Our clinical lead is reviewing the summaries topic by topic, and this note will change when that is done. Corpus last refreshed 2026-11-03. Spotted a mistake? Tell us and we will fix the summary or remove the study.

Similar studies